Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554994›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Configurational effects of personal innovativeness, self-efficacy, and perceived risk on AI adoption in media students.

Yanling Lan, Sihang Liu, Hao Chen, Linjie Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanling LanSchool of Film and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.
Sihang LiuSchool of Film and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.
Hao ChenSchool of Film and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China. haochen19606@163.com.
Linjie XiaSchool of Film and Communication, Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China.

Funding

The work was supported by the Innovation Strategy Research Project in Fujian Province of China No.2024R0110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (G-AI) is driving systemic transformations in the media industry, redefining the cultivation paradigm of media majors in higher education. This shift necessitates that future media professionals integrate AI thinking and master the application of digital intelligence technologies. To address the knowledge gap in understanding media students' adoption of AI technologies, this study extends the classical Technology Acceptance Model by incorporating personal innovativeness, AI self-efficacy, and perceived risk, thereby constructing a new and comprehensive model. A survey of 588 media students was conducted, and the data were analyzed using PLS-SEM and fsQCA. The results indicate that: (1) personal innovativeness and AI self-efficacy significantly enhance both perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use; (2) perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use are core determinants of AI behavioral intention, mediating the effects of personal innovativeness and AI self-efficacy; (3) perceived risks can negatively moderate the effect of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on AI behavioral intention; (4) AI behavioral intention is shaped not by a single linear determinant but by intersecting configurations of factors, leading to three distinct enhancement pathways: self-driven, efficacy-oriented, and risk-resistant. This study advances the Technology Acceptance Model by integrating psychological and risk-based constructs, offering theoretical insights into the multidimensional driving forces of AI adoption and practical strategies for fostering AI competencies in media students.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSelf EfficacyStudentsAdultDigital MediaFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultArtificial intelligence(AI)Media educationTechnology acceptance model (TAM)

Identifiers

PMID41554994
PMCPMC12890919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.