ArticleCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2026
A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic/toxicodynamic model framework for PARP inhibitor combination therapy with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics.
Article in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePoly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) can induce synthetic lethality in cancer cells with defective homologous recombination (HR) repair. Combination therapies with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics can overcome PARPi resistance and improve response in HR-proficient tumors, but myelotoxicities have limited their clinical success. Therefore, we developed a pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD)/toxicodynamic (TD) model to explore the impact of dosing regimen modifications on anti-tumor efficacy and myelotoxicity for PARPi combination therapy with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics.
methodsA mathematical framework was created linking drug PK exposure to downstream tumor PD and bone marrow TD effects driven by drug-induced DNA damage and cell death. Human PK parameters for a representative PARP inhibitor, olaparib, and DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic, temozolomide, were combined with in vitro-derived PD parameters and literature-derived TD parameters to enable model-based prediction of anti-tumor efficacy and myelotoxicity. To illustrate how the model framework can be parameterized to support extrapolation to the clinical setting, virtual patients (VPs) were created using distributions across a subset of physiological parameters to approximate clinical datasets describing response of breast cancer patients to olaparib and temozolomide therapy. Representation of tumor drug resistance was captured through incorporation of mixtures of HR-deficient and HR-proficient cells.
resultsSimulations with the human parameterization of the integrated PK-PD/TD model framework were used for model-based exploration of olaparib monotherapy and combination therapy regimens. While olaparib monotherapy can provide a strong initial size reduction for HR-deficient tumors, model simulations illustrated how the outgrowth of HR-proficient cells can drive rapid disease progression. In contrast, combination regimens with DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics such as temozolomide can prolong this time to progression by enhancing killing of HR-deficient cells while also restricting the outgrowth of HR-proficient cells. To facilitate identification of efficacious combination dosing regimens with acceptable toxicity profiles, we developed a combined optimization metric integrating simulated tumor size changes, time to progression, and toxicity for conducting model-based dose optimization.
conclusionAn integrated PK-PD/TD model framework was developed to support model-based exploration of potential factors contributing to the limited clinical success that has been observed to date with combinations of PARP inhibitors and DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics. Model simulations indicated that while many of the combinations could lead to rapid tumor size reductions, the corresponding rapid myelosuppression would become dose-limiting. However, simulated dosing regimens involving longer dose intervals or lower dose levels of the DNA-damaging chemotherapeutic might provide acceptable myelosuppression while still driving clinical benefit through an extension in the time to progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41554954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.