Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554946›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Network centrality drives optimal protection investment against systemic risk propagation in complex systems.

Chulwook Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chulwook ParkBK21 Four, Department of Physical Education, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, South Korea. pcw8531@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea 2020R1l1A1A01056967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the mechanisms underlying systemic risk mitigation in scale-free networks by modeling the roles of memorized capital, social learning, and centrality-based heuristics. The study employs a network-agent dynamic approach to examine how node centrality shapes protection decisions and vulnerability distributions. Using advanced computational methods and interactive simulations, the study systematically tracks key state variables and shows that nodes with higher centrality tend to invest more substantially in protection, indicating a positive relationship between centrality and proactive risk management. These findings provide new insights into risk propagation and highlight that local decision rules may converge to suboptimal equilibria when left uncoordinated. By demonstrating the critical role of strategic collaboration and regulatory oversight, the results outline potential pathways toward enhanced network resilience, offering both theoretical and practical contributions to systemic risk mitigation across interconnected domains.

Indexed as

CentralityHeuristicsNetwork–agent dynamicsProtective investmentSystemic risk

Identifiers

PMID41554946
PMCPMC12868806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.