ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantifying women's water polo overhead movement volumes using inertial measurement units and machine learning techniques: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Water polo upper limb external monitoring is not routinely used yet is important in modifying injury risk as shooting volume and intensity are associated with upper limb injury. Monitoring has been performed with video analysis by specialist staff however delays timely feedback-with potential athlete health implications. Inertial measurement units (IMU) are a potential solution. Objective was to investigate IMU and machine learning model performance in classifying overhead movements during coach-led training sessions in elite women's water polo.Athletes wore two IMUs in four training sessions and performed coach-led overhead movements. Video footage was coded using custom software. Vector and magnitude features were computed from IMU data to train five machine learning models. Model performance metrics were calculated.18,186 overhead movements were recorded from 10 athletes over 4 training sessions. Movements were coded under five classifications-swimming, high intensity throwing, low intensity throwing, blocking with ball contact and blocking without ball contact. Resultant and uniaxial acceleration and angular velocity were calculated. Five machine learning models were developed and assessed for performance. Random forest model demonstrated the best performance (accuracy: 0.765, macro-F1 score: 0.504). IMUs and random forest machine learning model have the potential for measuring overhead movements within training sessions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.