ArticleScientific reports2026
Impact of cemented paste backfill on mechanical properties and stability of coal pillars in open pit highwall mining.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During highwall backfill mining, the backfill substantially impacts the mechanical properties and stability of coal pillars. Analyzing the mechanical properties and failure characteristics of coal pillars under cemented paste backfill constraints is crucial for managing slope stability and enhancing resource recovery rates. The mechanical behavior of the backfill-coal pillar-backfill (BCB) was systematically examined under varying conditions of backfill ratios and strengths through a series of confined compression tests. The stress-strain curves, failure strength, and failure modes of BCBs were determined. Numerical simulations were used to evaluate the effectiveness of backfill in controlling slope deformation. The findings showed that the stress-strain curves of BCBs can be delineated into five stages: pore compaction, elastic bearing of the coal pillar, crack development and coalescence, failure of the coal pillar, and coal pillar bearing under backfill constraint. With low backfill ratios and strength, the failure strength of coal pillars was less than that without backfill. Increasing the backfill ratio and strength improved the failure strength of the coal pillars, changing the failure mode from localized shear failure in the upper unconstrained sections to a global shear-tensional composite failure. Once roof contact was made, the backfill provided active confinement and supported part of the load, greatly enhancing the coal pillars' load-bearing capacity. Through numerical simulation, the efficacy of backfill control was quantified, further revealing a non-linear variation. The backfill transitioned from providing passive confinement to engaging in active, cooperative load-bearing when the backfill ratio increased from 90% to 100%, effectively eliminating the plastic zone on the slope surface and minimizing slope deformation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.