ArticleScientific reports2026
Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Colonoscopy for Colorectal Lesion Detection: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The quantified immune-aging dysregulation index: a large-language model-powered method for annotating and quantifying systems-level dysregulation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- An explainable ResNet50-BiLSTM-attention framework with spatial token modeling and imbalance-aware learning for multi-class knee osteoarthritis severity grading.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- MLHNet-Lung: an attention-guided multi-level CNN-transformer fusion framework with CBAM and GeM pooling for explainable multiclass lung CT image classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and accurate analysis of histopathological images is critical for early diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. This study proposes and systematically evaluates four purpose-built lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) variants (Lite-V0, Lite-V1, Lite-V2, and Lite-V4) for binary classification of colon histopathology images into Colon_Adenocarcinoma and Colon_Benign_Tissue. Experiments were conducted on a balanced dataset (24,000 images) with fixed train/validation/test splits and comprehensive evaluation using accuracy and macro-F1, supported by confusion matrices and ROC/precision–recall analyses. Among all variants, Lite-V2 achieved the best validation performance (macro-F1 ≈ 0.999), while remaining highly compact (1.53 MB; 127,682 parameters), indicating a favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-off for deployment-oriented diagnostic support. On the independent test set, however, Lite-V2 exhibited a marked generalization drop, achieving approximately 50% accuracy and macro-F1 = 0.33, suggesting a domain-shift effect between validation and test samples. These findings demonstrate that lightweight CNNs can achieve near-perfect internal validation performance for colon histopathology classification, but robust cross-domain generalization remains essential; future work will focus on domain adaptation and stain-robust training strategies to improve reliability on unseen clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.