Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554906›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Compact deep learning models for colon histopathology focusing performance and generalization challenges.

Fareeha Hanif, Ali Raza, Heba Abdelgader Mohammed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fareeha HanifDepartment of Mathematics, University of Education, Vehari Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ali RazaDepartment of Mathematics, University of the Punjab, Quaid e Azam Campus, Lahore, Pakistan. alleerazza786@gmail.com.
Heba Abdelgader MohammedTechnical and Engineering Specialties Unit, Applied College, King Khalid University, Mohyel Asser, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Deanship of Scientific Research, King Khalid University RGP2/561/46
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and accurate analysis of histopathological images is critical for early diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. This study proposes and systematically evaluates four purpose-built lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) variants (Lite-V0, Lite-V1, Lite-V2, and Lite-V4) for binary classification of colon histopathology images into Colon_Adenocarcinoma and Colon_Benign_Tissue. Experiments were conducted on a balanced dataset (24,000 images) with fixed train/validation/test splits and comprehensive evaluation using accuracy and macro-F1, supported by confusion matrices and ROC/precision–recall analyses. Among all variants, Lite-V2 achieved the best validation performance (macro-F1 ≈ 0.999), while remaining highly compact (1.53 MB; 127,682 parameters), indicating a favorable accuracy–efficiency trade-off for deployment-oriented diagnostic support. On the independent test set, however, Lite-V2 exhibited a marked generalization drop, achieving approximately 50% accuracy and macro-F1 = 0.33, suggesting a domain-shift effect between validation and test samples. These findings demonstrate that lightweight CNNs can achieve near-perfect internal validation performance for colon histopathology classification, but robust cross-domain generalization remains essential; future work will focus on domain adaptation and stain-robust training strategies to improve reliability on unseen clinical data.

Indexed as

ColonColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDeep LearningConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedColorectal cancer classificationConvolutional neural networksHistopathological imagesLightweight CNNModel comparison

Identifiers

PMID41554906
PMCPMC12886981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.