ArticleScientific reports2026
Graphitic carbon nitride-reduced graphene oxide (g-C
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon-based two-dimensional nanomaterials (CB-2DMs) for high-performance wound healing platforms bridging mechanics and medicine.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Enhanced Photocatalytic Removal of Selected Pharmaceuticals from MBR-Treated Wastewater Using a g-CMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of GO/g-CScientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The nanocomposites of g-C3N4 were prepared with reduced graphene oxide by reducing it with ascorbic acid (AA) and NaBH4. As-fabricated g-C3N4@r-GO nanocomposites were used in a water splitting to generate hydrogen i.e. 339.82 µmolh− 1g− 1 form the nanocomposite g-C3N4@r-GO (AA) with 2.52% apparent quantum efficiency at 420 nm, which is 5.6, 3.4, 1.6, and 1.4 times higher than their counterparts, g-C3N4, GO, g-C3N4@GO, and g-C3N4@GO(NaBH4), respectively. The composites were also tested for specific capacitance, where the composite g-C3N4@r-GO (AA) demonstrated the highest specific capacitance of 322.77 F g− 1 at 2 A/g in aqueous 2 M KOH with 78.56% charge retention after 5000 cycles at 3 A/g. The SPV study confirm the formation of effective interface with p-n junction, minimum band gap by using optical absorption, effective charge transfer using EIS, interfacial interaction, layered structure, and PLE study approve minimum charge-recombination rate in nanocomposites g-C3N4@r-GO(AA) that significantly supported the reasonable H2 generation rate as well as the good super capacitive behaviour. The substance under study guarantees a promising position in the development of the mystical material for the preparation of H2 and next-generation high-performance electrochemical supercapacitors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.