ArticleScientific reports2026
Multiparametric MRI radiomics nomogram predicts synchronous distant metastasis in rectal cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a multiparametric MRI-based radiomics nomogram for identifying patients with rectal cancer (RC) at high risk of synchronous distant metastasis (SDM). A fusion feature selection strategy, which combined univariate analysis with three machine learning algorithms, was employed to optimize predictive signatures from the 1,688 radiomics features extracted using PyRadiomics. A retrospective cohort of 169 RC patients (stratified into training and test sets at an 8:2 ratio, n = 134/35) was analyzed. Among these, 48.5% (82/169) presented with SDM. Following the screening process, four clinical characteristics were selected. Feature selection yielded eight features from diffusion-weighted (DW) images, eight from T2-weighted (T2W) images, and six from the combined radiomics model (integrating DW and T2W phases). The clinical-radiomics nomogram demonstrated superior predictive performance over standalone clinical or radiomics models, achieving areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.89-0.96) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.79-0.97) in the training and test cohorts, respectively, with balanced sensitivity (0.85-0.88) and specificity (0.86-0.89). The calibration plots demonstrated alignment between the nomogram's predictions and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the nomogram model provided the highest net benefit across both the training and test sets, outperforming the standalone clinical and radiomics models. Consequently, this MRI-based radiomics nomogram could assist in the preoperative identification of RC patients at high SDM risk, thereby optimizing clinical management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.