ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in Ordos city based on the Game Theory-Topsis-Grey Prediction coupling model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Under the national strategy of ecological protection and high-quality development in the Yellow River Basin, Ordos, a major coal production base in China contributing ~ 17.1% of China’s annual raw coal output, faces prominent water shortage and ecological fragility. This study constructed a “Game Theory-TOPSIS-Grey Prediction” coupled model: it integrated subjective and objective weights via game theory (reducing weight coefficient of variation by 35%), evaluated water resources carrying capacity (WRCC) during 2000–2023 (the WRCC index increased from 0.3285 to 0.6373, with an average annual growth rate of 2.92%; growth slowed to 1.69% during 2016–2023, showing a “strong east-weak west” spatial pattern), and predicted WRCC trends for 2025–2040 using the GM(1,1) model. The GM(1,1) model achieved first-level accuracy (average relative error 6.35%, posterior error ratio 0.327, small error probability 0.962), with predicted WRCC indices of 0.6261 (2025), 0.7676 (2030), and 0.9736 (2040). This study provides a dynamic tool for “water-energy-ecology” coordinated governance of resource-based cities in China’s Yellow River Basin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.