Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554864›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Visual control of walking using terrain reconstructions.

Daniel P Panfili, Karl Muller, Kathryn Bonnen, Mary M Hayhoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel P PanfiliCenter for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Karl MullerCenter for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Kathryn BonnenSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Mary M HayhoeCenter for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. hayhoe@utexas.edu.

Funding

VISUAL SENSITIVITY REGULATION &COLOR CODINGR01EY005729 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HAYHOE, MARY M · 1985 to 2023
$7.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005729NIH HHS EY05729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In rough terrain, walkers must use vision to select viable paths and to find suitable footholds within the time frame allowed by the gait cycle. How is this visuo-motor loop controlled? Recent work demonstrated that walkers look closer to the body in complex terrain, presumably to improve visual information about the terrain structure. However, because the 3D geometry of the terrain was not known, precision of the estimates of gaze and foothold location was limited. Using a 3D modeling technique called photogrammetry, we were able to create 3D representations of the terrain using a head-mounted scene camera. This allows more accurate localization of both gaze and footholds. The goal of the current paper was to measure how closely gaze fell relative to footholds. On medium and rough terrains, gaze was centered around individual steps, with a standard deviation of about 0.25 m, indicating the primary role of gaze was visual information for foothold selection, as well as for longer-term path planning. The spread of the distributions suggests that information from the parafoveal retina is often adequate for guiding foothold selection, even in highly irregular terrain.

Identifiers

PMID41554864
PMCPMC12894906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.