ArticleScientific reports2026
Wood biomass ash as a clinker substitute in advancing next-generation blended cement: Croatian case study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This research investigates the use of wood biomass ash (WBA) as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in blended cement formulations containing 6 and 12 wt% of bottom WBA. Motivated by the need to advance low-carbon cement production, reduce reliance on imported materials, and incorporate waste management strategies, the study explores sustainable pathways for cement manufacturing. Experimental results show that the 6 wt% WBA blend (BLEND BC-II) achieves a compressive strength of 59.3 MPa after 28 days, surpassing the reference CEM II, whereas the 12 wt% WBA blend (BLEND BC-I) also delivers favourable mechanical and durability performance, including a chloride diffusion coefficient of 15.85 × 10⁻¹² m²/s, capillary absorption of 0.68 g/m²·h¹/², and gas permeability of 0.50 × 10⁻¹⁶ m². Volume stability tests of the 12 wt% WBA blend confirm that autogenous deformations remain below − 0.017 mm/m after 90 days, indicating effective mitigation of shrinkage and reliable dimensional stability. When combined with other SCMs, WBA further improves long-term mechanical performance. Despite challenges related to compositional variability and infrastructure requirements, WBA incorporation can reduce environmental impact and support low-carbon cement production. Achieving net-zero emissions extends beyond quantitative targets, requiring the restoration of balance between resource use, material efficiency, and environmental sustainability. These findings demonstrate that WBA is a viable SCM, advancing sustainable and resilient cement manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.