Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554845›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Wood biomass ash as a clinker substitute in advancing next-generation blended cement: Croatian case study.

Ivana Carević, Jelena Šantek Bajto, Martina Grubor, Nina Štirmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ivana CarevićDepartment of Materials, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Fra Andrije Kačića Miošića 26, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.
Jelena Šantek BajtoDepartment of Materials, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Fra Andrije Kačića Miošića 26, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia. jelena.santek.bajto@grad.unizg.hr.
Martina GruborUniversity of Zadar, Ulica Mihovila Pavlinovića 1, 23000 Zadar, Croatia.
Nina ŠtirmerDepartment of Materials, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Fra Andrije Kačića Miošića 26, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia.

Funding

HORIZON-CL4-2021-TWIN-TRANSITION-01 Project No. 101058162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research investigates the use of wood biomass ash (WBA) as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM) in blended cement formulations containing 6 and 12 wt% of bottom WBA. Motivated by the need to advance low-carbon cement production, reduce reliance on imported materials, and incorporate waste management strategies, the study explores sustainable pathways for cement manufacturing. Experimental results show that the 6 wt% WBA blend (BLEND BC-II) achieves a compressive strength of 59.3 MPa after 28 days, surpassing the reference CEM II, whereas the 12 wt% WBA blend (BLEND BC-I) also delivers favourable mechanical and durability performance, including a chloride diffusion coefficient of 15.85 × 10⁻¹² m²/s, capillary absorption of 0.68 g/m²·h¹/², and gas permeability of 0.50 × 10⁻¹⁶ m². Volume stability tests of the 12 wt% WBA blend confirm that autogenous deformations remain below − 0.017 mm/m after 90 days, indicating effective mitigation of shrinkage and reliable dimensional stability. When combined with other SCMs, WBA further improves long-term mechanical performance. Despite challenges related to compositional variability and infrastructure requirements, WBA incorporation can reduce environmental impact and support low-carbon cement production. Achieving net-zero emissions extends beyond quantitative targets, requiring the restoration of balance between resource use, material efficiency, and environmental sustainability. These findings demonstrate that WBA is a viable SCM, advancing sustainable and resilient cement manufacturing.

Indexed as

Blended cementCircular conceptsClinker replacementIncineration ashesSustainability

Identifiers

PMID41554845
PMCPMC12855976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.