Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554825›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Forecasting occupational accidents in Turkey using multivariate ARMAX and NLARX models.

Selcan Kaplanvural, Eren Tosyalı, İsmail Ekmekçi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Selcan KaplanvuralVocational School of Health Services, Occupational Health and Safety, Istanbul Bilgi University, 34387, Istanbul, Turkey. selcan.cicek@bilgi.edu.tr.
Eren TosyalıDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Istanbul Bilgi University, 34060, Istanbul, Turkey.
İsmail EkmekçiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Istanbul Commerce University, 34840, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational accidents remain a critical issue in Turkey, with significant social and economic consequences, and understanding accident trends is essential for developing effective prevention strategies. This study employed both linear AutoRegressive Moving Average with Exogenous Input (ARMAX) and Nonlinear AutoRegressive with Exogenous Input (NLARX) models to forecast future occupational accidents using four accident-related populations ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]) derived from official insurance records. Due to the lack of consistently reported monthly data from the Social Security Institution (SSI), exogenous variables such as sectoral, economic, or demographic indicators were not incorporated, and the models were therefore identified based solely on the endogenous accident dynamics. The ARMAX identification process yielded a relatively large set of candidate parameters, which were subsequently evaluated using statistical significance criteria; only coefficients with p values below 0.05 and confidence intervals excluding zero were retained for interpretation. Model performance was evaluated using the normalized mean squared error (NMSE), which was computed separately for the training period, the test (out-of-sample forecasting) period, and the full dataset for each model. This multi-level evaluation enabled a consistent comparison of in-sample fitting accuracy, out-of-sample generalization capability, and overall predictive performance across ARMAX and NLARX models. The significance-based analysis revealed distinct linear dynamic structures across the output groups, with the [Formula: see text] populations characterized by a larger number of moderate-magnitude significant coefficients, whereas [Formula: see text] exhibited fewer but more dominant linear effects. The ARMAX model produced the lowest NMSE values across the training, test, and full datasets for most populations, demonstrating particularly strong and stable predictive accuracy for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]. The NLARX model yielded the best performance for [Formula: see text] and showed comparable NMSE values to ARMAX for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], although it exhibited higher forecasting errors for [Formula: see text], especially in the test period. Overall, the results indicated that while NLARX was capable of capturing nonlinear patterns in specific cases, the ARMAX framework provided a more robust, interpretable, and consistently generalizable representation of the dominant temporal dynamics governing occupational accident trends. These findings highlighted the potential of multivariate time series models to support evidence-based decision-making in occupational safety planning and policy development.

Indexed as

ARMAXNLARXOccupational accidentsOHS modellingTime series forecasting

Identifiers

PMID41554825
PMCPMC12891674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.