ArticleScientific reports2026
High-fidelity and efficient particle microscopy via regional focus search and adaptive focus stacking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing utilization of micro-nano particles across diverse fields requires precise characterization of their microscopic features, as these features directly influence product performance. Image-based detection offers a promising solution; however, variations in particle size and distribution can impact image focus, leading to distorted feature information. To address this challenge and ensure clear observation and accurate detection, we proposed a method for generating high-resolution particle images by leveraging focus stacking technology in conjunction with focused search method. After determining the image sharpness evaluation function and particle size measurement standard, this method combines multiple images captured at different focal points to reconstruct a single image with enhanced particle details, thereby improving the accuracy of detection features. Experimental validation was conducted using polystyrene particles of three mixed suspensions, the average errors in particle size for the reconstructed images were 2.23%, 1.39% and 1.89%, respectively, which are lower than those of the particle images before reconstruction, validating the effectiveness of this method. The reconstructed images showed clearer two-dimensional outlines of particles, with minimal errors in particle size and shape. Additionally, the method can differentiate particles of different sizes based on their texture features, resulting in a bimodal distribution that provides more accurate representation of particle size data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.