ArticleScientific reports2026
Identification of sensorineural hearing loss subtypes using unsupervised machine learning and assessment of their replicability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite nearly 20% of the global population experiencing hearing loss, there remains limited insight into the underlying subtypes of its most prevalent cause, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). This understanding is crucial for effective therapeutic and preventative strategies. A recent study using a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) identified 10 distinct SNHL phenotypes in a large US cohort, highlighting the potential of unsupervised machine learning (UML) to provide a data-driven solution to this task. Rigorous validation of these models is essential; however, it is limited due to several factors, including the absence of ground truth labels for model evaluation, restricted data access, and the lack of a standardized reporting framework for comparing results across clustering studies. Here, we apply a GMM to a UK database of 109,854 audiograms, revealing 9 phenotypes, partly overlapping with prior findings. Notably, our study cohort is characterized by advanced age, a higher proportion of female participants, and more severe hearing impairments. We observed instability in the GMM model when subjected to variations in the original dataset. To enhance practices, we propose a Clustering Replicability Framework, ensuring robustness in UML driven health research for safe clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.