Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554815›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2026

Association between driving pressure and recruitment-to-inflation ratio in personalized PEEP management at the bedside.

Mert Yetgın, Hale Yetgın, Hülya Sungurtekın

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mert YetgınDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. dr.mrtytgn1995@hotmail.com.
Hale YetgınDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. hapaydin@pau.edu.tr.
Hülya SungurtekınDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration is crucial for preserving lung mechanics and physiology in mechanically ventilated patients. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and compliance can be used for this purpose. Based on these parameters, the Recruitment/Inflation ratio (R/I) has been used to estimate lung recruitability. We aimed to investigate the relationship between driving pressure and the Recruitment/Inflation ratio at two consecutive PEEP levels for appropriate PEEP selection in patients receiving mechanical ventilation support. End-expiratory lung volume (EELV) was measured during a decremental PEEP trial (PEEP levels of 20,15,10 and 5 cmH

Indexed as

LungPositive-Pressure RespirationAgedFemaleHumansLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory MechanicsTidal VolumeFunctional residual capacityIntensive care unitsMechanical ventilatorPEEPRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID41554815
PMCPMC12891550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.