Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554805›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Maxillary sinus classification for sex and age using 23 artificial intelligence architectures.

Wahaj Anees, Rianne Silva, Amber Khan, Jared Murray, Leonardo Scavassini, Mariana Burle, Nikolaos Angelakopoulos, Marcelo Henrique Napimoga, Lucas Porto, André Abade and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wahaj AneesDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5502-2747
Rianne SilvaDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4816-7528
Amber KhanDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3618-450X
Jared Murray, Dundee, Scotland, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8806-2442
Leonardo ScavassiniDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1491-3435
Mariana BurleDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4308-6936
Nikolaos AngelakopoulosDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. nikolaos.angelakopoulos@unibe.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8511-4645
Marcelo Henrique NapimogaDivision of Immunology, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-365X
Lucas PortoComputer vision and Engineering consultant, Brasília, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2170-427X
André AbadeComputer Science, Federal Institute of Science and Technology, Barra do Garças, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9771-9123
Ademir FrancoDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-2781

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have relied on conventional imaging and traditional morphometric analyses of the maxillary sinuses (MS) for sex and age estimation, but little is known about the performance of deep learning models. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) in classifying individuals by sex and age through the radiographic assessment of the MS. Panoramic radiographs of individuals aged 6–22.99 years were sampled. Twenty-one CNNs and two Transformer-based architectures were tested. Tasks consisted of binary sex and age (≤ 15 vs. >15 years) and multiclass (sex + age) classifications. For sex classification, the highest accuracies were achieved by DeiT (0.807), ViT (0.806), and EfficientNetV2M (0.781), while for age classification, YOLOv11 (0.953), ViT (0.949), and DeiT (0.946) showed the best performance. The multiclass task yielded accuracies of 0.754, 0.753 and 0.734 by YOLOv11, DeiT, and ViT, respectively. Transformers consistently outperformed conventional CNNs, while YOLOv11 and EfficientNetV2M also demonstrated competitive performance. The studied artificial intelligence models may be useful as adjuncts for binary sex and age classification, but multiclass applications are still premature needing further research before their use in forensic practice can be recommended.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMaxillary SinusAdolescentAge FactorsChildConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleRadiography, PanoramicYoung AdultAnatomyArtificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networksForensic dentistryMaxillary sinusSex

Identifiers

PMID41554805
PMCPMC12891728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.