ArticleScientific reports2026
Maxillary sinus classification for sex and age using 23 artificial intelligence architectures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based sex estimation from multi-planar cranial CT images in a Thai population.Anatomical science international · 2026Article
- Morphometric Analysis of the Maxillary Sinus Using CT-Based Air-Cavity Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have relied on conventional imaging and traditional morphometric analyses of the maxillary sinuses (MS) for sex and age estimation, but little is known about the performance of deep learning models. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs) in classifying individuals by sex and age through the radiographic assessment of the MS. Panoramic radiographs of individuals aged 6–22.99 years were sampled. Twenty-one CNNs and two Transformer-based architectures were tested. Tasks consisted of binary sex and age (≤ 15 vs. >15 years) and multiclass (sex + age) classifications. For sex classification, the highest accuracies were achieved by DeiT (0.807), ViT (0.806), and EfficientNetV2M (0.781), while for age classification, YOLOv11 (0.953), ViT (0.949), and DeiT (0.946) showed the best performance. The multiclass task yielded accuracies of 0.754, 0.753 and 0.734 by YOLOv11, DeiT, and ViT, respectively. Transformers consistently outperformed conventional CNNs, while YOLOv11 and EfficientNetV2M also demonstrated competitive performance. The studied artificial intelligence models may be useful as adjuncts for binary sex and age classification, but multiclass applications are still premature needing further research before their use in forensic practice can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.