ArticleScientific reports2026
Provider-perspective cost analysis of comprehensive pediatric cataract management in a low-income setting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood cataract is a leading cause of avoidable blindness in sub-Saharan Africa, but affected children rarely self-present. Therefore, programs must fund proactive case-finding and ongoing follow-up. We quantified, from a provider perspective, the costs of identification, surgery, follow-up, and rehabilitation in Kinshasa, DRC. We analyzed costs (March 2024) of a community-embedded program linked with hospital services. The pathway from screening to bilateral surgery and two-year follow-up was mapped. Costs (2024 USD) from hospital and payroll data and interviews were cross-checked regionally. A step-fixed model captured screening expansion; patient-incurred costs were excluded. The network held 32 screenings for ~ 134,400 people annually, identifying 38 children (28.3/100,000). Unit costs were $0.08 per person screened and $268.4 ± 53.7 per child (30.7%) identified; surgery $529 per child (60.5%); follow-up $77 ± 15.4 (8.8%). Average continuum cost was $875 ± 69.1 per child. Treating 38 children cost $33,245 ± 2,625.2 annually. Scaling to 1,000,000 people required eight teams, identifying 283 children at a program cost of $253,223 ± 20,678. Comprehensive pediatric cataract care is feasible at ~$875 per child when budgets include community case-finding, coordination, and follow-up alongside consumables and theatre. Volunteer-reliant case-finding and rehabilitation require funded core staff for stability. These data provide a pragmatic template for scaling programs in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.