ArticleScientific reports2026
Social rank and social environment combinedly affect REM sleep in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in sleep deprivation.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The interplay of sleep quality, social hierarchy, and social isolation remains elusive. We evaluated such interplay using two mouse lines: C57BL/6J (B6) mice with relatively weak social hierarchy, and ICR×B6 F1 hybrid mice with relatively robust social hierarchy. Considering the potential effects of group housing on sleep - both through direct physical contact and other social interactions, which complicates interpretation-we designed a neighbor-housing condition that eliminates effects of direct physical contact while preserving social context. Under this condition, sleep architecture did not differ significantly between dominant and subordinate mice of either line. Under the single-housing condition, sleep differences emerged, some of which depended on both social rank and mouse line. In both mouse lines, single housing had opposite effects on oscillatory activities during sleep between dominant and subordinate mice. Notably, single housing significantly increased rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) amount only in subordinate B6 mice, but not in subordinate F1 hybrids or dominant mice of either lines, suggesting a genetically modulated sensitivity to social conditions. Our findings suggest complicated interactions between social environment, social hierarchy, and genetic factors in REMS regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.