ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantitative method of pipeline magnetic leakage internal signal detection on the basis of an improved neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In response to the problem of poor quantification ability and unclear feature correlation of pipeline defect magnetic flux leakage signals, a neural network is proposed to establish the relationship between the characteristic quantities of pipeline defect magnetic flux leakage signals and defect sizes. The characteristic quantities of pipeline defect magnetic flux leakage signals that measure the length, width and depth of pipeline defects are determined by combining the characteristic quantities of the radial and axial components of defect magnetic flux leakage signals in actual pipelines. A database of magnetic leakage signal characteristic quantities for pipeline defects is established by extracting and organizing the characteristic quantities of magnetic leakage signals. Moreover, a particle swarm optimization (PSO)-radial basis function (RBF) neural network model that combines the PSO algorithm and the RBF neural network to quantify pipeline defects is designed. Results show that the average quantification error of the PSO-RBF network model reached 21.08%, representing an improvement of 12.94% compared with that of the traditional RBF network model. The Pearson correlation analysis shows that these feature quantities are significantly positively correlated with the defect size, which provides a reliable feature basis for quantitative modeling.It meets the requirements of practical engineering applications for pipeline defect quantification and has a good application prospect in pipeline magnetic leakage internal detection technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.