ArticleScientific reports2026
Utilization of electronic plastic waste as fine aggregate with and without silica fume in concrete: experimentation and life cycle assessment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical and microstructural performance evaluation for cement-based mortar: calcined mud powder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The depletion of natural resources has created an urgent need to identify alternative, sustainable materials for construction. Simultaneously, the rapid global accumulation and improper disposal of electronic waste (E-waste), particularly in developing countries, have raised significant environmental and public health concerns. This study investigates the use of electronic plastic waste (E-PW) as a partial replacement for fine aggregate in concrete, with replacement levels of 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% evaluated at different curing ages. While the inclusion of E-PW led to reductions in mechanical and durability performance compared to conventional concrete, these effects were mitigated by replacing 10% of the cement with silica fume (SF). The enhancement provided by SF demonstrated improved strength and performance in the E-PW concrete mixtures. According to SEM results, SF highlights the interfacial transition zone (ITZ) associated with E-PW in the OPC matrix. The best performing mix for blends containing E-PW and SF were M7 (5% E-PW + 10% SF), achieved a compressive strength of 37.69 MPa, a flexural strength of 5.36 MPa, and a splitting tensile strength of 3.91 MPa at 56 days, surpassing those of the reference concrete. An environmental perspective, life cycle assessment demonstrated that a 20% replacement of fine aggregates with E-PW reduced the overall environmental burden by 5.3% and lowered the global warming potential by 1.43%, equivalent to saving approximately 4-5 kg CO₂-eq per cubic meter of concrete. Hence, the findings support the potential for producing eco-efficient concrete by partially replacing natural sand with E-waste, contributing to resource conservation and environmental sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.