SynthesisScientific reports2026
A one compartment model to assess skin lightening rate of cosmetic formulae in UV induced clinical studies.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet-induced skin darkening is often used as a clinical model to assess the efficacy of active ingredients aimed at modulating skin pigmentation ; targeting pigmentary skin disorders. Studying Ultraviolet (UV)-induced skin pigmentation therefore presents challenges due to the complex pigmentation kinetics involved. This work aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model to describe the UV pigmentation kinetics, compare products efficacy with their corresponding vehicle in terms of elimination, i.e., the efficacy to decrease pigmentation, and conduct a meta-analysis on the elimination rate constants (ke) resulting from the model to compare different products. The use of popPK model is limited to the statistical framework (i.e. differential equation modeling) and this paper does not aim to conduct a formal popPK analysis of the pigmentation. A one-compartment model appropriately accounted for the observed kinetics. The model fits were satisfactory, with data symmetrically distributed around the identity line and individual weighted residuals showing no deviation from normality. Overall, the integration of popPK modeling and meta-analysis represents a novel and promising approach to advancing our understanding of pigmentation kinetics following UV exposure and evaluating the comparative efficacy of skin lightening agents against UV-induced pigmentation based on ke values. Further research in cosmetical product development could lead to more applications of popPK models allowing for a greater understanding of the mechanisms at play in cosmetic product efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.