ArticleScientific reports2026
Amplicon-based sequencing as a diagnostic tool for severe pneumonia in the ICU.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oxford Nanopore Sequencing, a Promising Technology for Precision Diagnostics in Intensive Care Units: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Immune monitoring, immune phenotyping, and precision intervention in severe pneumonia: current evidence and translational challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The microbiological diagnosis of severe pneumonia in intensive care unit (ICU) patients remains challenging. We investigated whether amplicon-based sequencing (ABS) could provide additional value in this setting. Bacterial 16S rRNA coupled with fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ABS was compared with standard of care (SOC) comprising cultures, PCR and galactomannan on bronchoalveolar lavages of immunosuppressed and immunocompetent ICU patients presenting severe pneumonia (n = 24) and noninfected lung-transplanted patients (n = 12). The ABS-matched SOC results were complete for 20/36 (55.5%) samples. Regarding 16S rRNA, ten samples showed partial agreement, whereas five others were fully discordant. Discordances were observed mainly for gram-negative organisms, either for quantification (Enterobacteria) or identification (Enterobacter sp., Haemophilus sp.). Only 1 of the 36 ITS results were discordant with the SOC results. The ABS has proven to be more valuable in immunosuppressed patients. Despite limitations in bacterial identification, pathogens not reported by SOC were detected in 8 samples (coinfections, bacterial superinfections from viral pneumonia). ITS identification was reliable, and semiquantification helped distinguish P. jirovecii infection and colonization. The correlation between galactomannan and ITS was good. While 16S rRNA sequencing is interesting for severe pneumonia of undefined aetiology in IS patients, ITS could provide additional diagnostic value for severe fungal pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.