ArticleScientific data2026
Reconstruction of Extreme Sea Levels in coastal China using Multiple Deep Learning models.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a 1970-2020 dataset of daily maximum coastal water levels reconstructed for 23 tide gauges along China's coast. The product combines storm-surge residuals predicted with an Informer-based deep learning workflow (benchmarked against LSTM, CNN-LSTM, and ConvLSTM) with astronomical tides estimated by UTide from historical observations. Predictors are drawn from ERA5 reanalysis and multi-source tide-gauge records are used for training and validation. For each station, the model with best validation skill generates residuals combined with tidal harmonics to form daily maxima. Across stations, the reconstruction attains a mean correlation coefficient of 0.81 and RMSE of 11.7 cm for daily maxima; for events above the 95th percentile, the mean correlation is 0.68 and RMSE is typically below 20 cm. The release includes metadata, data splits, and skill metrics for transparency and reuse. This dataset enables spatiotemporal analyses of extreme coastal water levels and coastal hazard mitigation in regions with sparse observations. Daily maxima are computed as the sum of the maximum tide and maximum surge. This serves as an upper bound, as the peaks of tide and surge rarely coincide. Using hourly data, we estimate a mean non-coincidence bias of 14.9 cm (14.8%). Additionally, station-specific statistics are provided for user adjustment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.