Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554739›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Physical neural networks using sharpness-aware training.

Tengji Xu, Zeyu Luo, Shaojie Liu, Li Fan, Qiarong Xiao, Benshan Wang, Dongliang Wang, Chaoran Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tengji Xu *Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Zeyu Luo *Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Shaojie Liu *Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4071-3256
Li Fan *Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Qiarong XiaoDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Benshan WangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9208-1378
Dongliang WangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8529-1449
Chaoran HuangDepartment of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. crhuang@ee.cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6997-758X

Funding

Innovation and Technology Fund (ITF) ITS/237/22Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology) National Key Research and Development Program of China 2024YFE0203600National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 62405258Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) ECS 24203724Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) GRF 14208925Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) NSFC/RGC N_CUHK444/22Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) STG3/E-404/24-NResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) YCRG C1002-22YResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee (RGC, UGC) YCRG C4004-24Y
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in AI are pushing the limits of traditional hardware, making physical neural networks (PNNs) a promising alternative. However, training PNNs remains challenging: in silico training suffers from model-reality mismatch, while in situ training produces device-specific models that do not transfer across fabrication variations. Both approaches are further compromised by post-deployment perturbations, such as thermal drift or misalignment, which invalidate trained models and require retraining. We address these challenges through sharpness-aware training (SAT), inspired by sharpness-aware minimization, which links loss landscape geometry to generalization. We establish a connection between loss landscape sharpness and robustness in physical systems and leverage it to improve PNN training. SAT is compatible with both in silico and in situ settings: it mitigates model-reality gaps, enables cross-device transfer, and provides strong resilience to post-deployment perturbations without retraining. We demonstrate SAT across three PNN platforms and multiple tasks, including classification, compression, reconstruction, and generation, showing its broad applicability.

Identifiers

PMID41554739
PMCPMC12917175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.