ArticleCancer medicine2026
A Real-World Analysis of Outcomes in CIC-Rearranged Sarcomas: A Canadian Sarcoma Research and Clinical Collaboration (CanSaRCC) Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCIC-rearranged sarcomas (CRS) are rare tumors predominantly affecting young adults. Despite distinct biology, CRS are often treated like Ewing sarcomas with multi-agent chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy, although the benefits of each remain unclear. We report the impact of treatment on response and survival.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included patients diagnosed with CRS between 2002 and 2023. Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were collected. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis; risk factors were assessed via log-rank tests and Cox regression. Treatment response was assessed using RECIST.
resultsAmong 27 patients (median age 21.5 years; range 8-83), 14 (52%) had localized and 12 (44%) metastatic disease (1 unknown). In the localized group, 6 (43%) received chemotherapy (Response: 2 complete, CR; 1 partial, PR; 1 mixed, MR; 1 stable, SD; 1 progressive disease, PD); 5 (36%) died-3 (21%) had received chemotherapy. Among metastatic patients, 10 (83%) received chemotherapy (1 CR, 5 PR, 2 MR, 1 PD); 9 died (one without chemotherapy). Local control was achieved in 12/14 (86%) localized and 7/12 (56%) metastatic patients. Only surgical resection was associated with improved OS (HR 0.13; p < 0.01) and EFS (HR 0.26; p < 0.01), particularly with R0 resection (EFS HR 0.23; p = 0.02). At median follow-up of 18 months, 2-year EFS was 56% vs. 8% (p = 0.02) and OS was 67% vs. 23% (p = 0.02) for localized vs. metastatic disease.
conclusionComplete resection is critical in CRS. Chemotherapy benefit remains uncertain, underscoring the need for improved local control and novel, biology-driven therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.