ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Purkinje Cell Collaterals Preferentially Target a Subtype of Molecular Layer Interneuron.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Random innervation of cerebellar Purkinje cells as a substrate for diverse representational learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.Research square · 2026Article
- Coordination of spike timing among the neurons of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In addition to providing outputs from the cerebellar cortex, Purkinje cell (PC) axon collaterals target other PCs, molecular layer interneurons (MLIs), and Purkinje layer interneurons (PLIs). It was assumed that PC collaterals to MLI synapses provide positive feedback to PCs via the PC-MLI-PC pathway, because it was thought that MLIs primarily inhibit PCs. However, it was recently shown that MLIs consist of two subtypes: MLI1s primarily inhibit PCs, whereas MLI2s mainly inhibit MLI1s and disinhibit PCs. Clarifying PC connectivity onto these MLI subtypes is vital to understanding the influence of feedback from PC collaterals. Here we use a combination of serial electron microscopy (EM) and optogenetic studies to characterize PC synapses onto MLI subtypes in mice of either sex. EM reconstructions show that PCs make 53% of their synapses onto other PCs, 32% onto PLIs, 6% onto MLI1s, and 7% onto MLI2s. Since there are far more MLI1s than MLI2s, each MLI2 is expected to receive many more synapses than each MLI1. In slice experiments, optogenetic activation of PCs evokes inhibitory currents in most MLI2s but primarily disinhibits MLI1s. We also find that candelabrum cells, a type of PLI, form many more synapses onto MLI1s than MLI2s. These findings suggest that PC-MLI synapses do not primarily disinhibit PCs and that the PC-MLI2-MLI1-PC and PC-PLI-MLI1-PC pathways might provide negative feedback to PCs that acts in concert with PC-PC synapses to counter elevations in PC firing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.