ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Predictive Distractor Processing Relies on Integrated Proactive and Reactive Attentional Mechanisms.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Past and present goals are represented concurrently during visual search.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- A multichannel MEG time-frequency analysis framework for detecting stage -specific effects of spatial distraction in visual-spatial working memory.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual attention is shaped by statistical regularities in the environment, with spatially predictable distractors being proactively suppressed. The neural mechanisms underpinning this suppression remain poorly understood. In this study, we employed magnetoencephalography and multivariate classification analysis to investigate how predicted distractor locations are proactively processed in the human brain. Male and female human participants engaged in a statistical learning visual search task that required them to identify a target stimulus while ignoring a color-singleton distractor. Critically, the distractor appeared more frequently on one side of the visual field, creating an implicit spatial prediction. Our results revealed that distractor locations were encoded in temporo-occipital brain regions prior to the presentation of the search array, supporting the hypothesis that proactive suppression guides visual attention away from predictable distractors. The neural activity patterns corresponding to this presearch distractor processing extended to postsearch activity during late attentional stages (∼200 ms), suggesting an integrated suppressive mechanism. Notably, this generalization from pre- to postsearch phases was absent in the early sensory processing stages (∼100 ms), suggesting that postsearch distractor processing is not merely a continuation of sustained proactive processing but involves re-engagement of the same mechanism at distinct stages. These findings establish a mechanistic link between proactive and reactive processing of predictable distractors, demonstrating both shared and unique contributions to attentional selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.