ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Spatial Frequency Tuning Follows Scale Invariance in the Human Visual Cortex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-based estimation of the population contrast response function in human visual cortex.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- The Population Spatial Frequency Toolbox.Journal of open research software · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our visual system can recognize patterns across many spatial scales. A fundamental assumption in visual neuroscience is that this ability relies on the putative scale-invariant properties of receptive fields (RFs) in early vision, whereby the spatial area over which a visual neuron responds is proportional to the spatial scale of information it can encode (i.e., spatial frequency, SF). In other words, the resolution of spatial sampling of a RF is assumed to be constant in the visual cortex. However, this assumption has gone untested in the human visual cortex. To address this, we leveraged model-based fMRI techniques that characterize the spatial tuning and SF preferences of cortical subpopulations sampled within a voxel across eight participants (five females, three males). We find that the voxel-wise ratio between peak SF tuning and RF size-expressed as "cycles per RF"-remains constant across visual areas V1, V2, and V3, suggesting that, at the population level, SF preferences are inversely proportional to the RF size, a tenet of scale invariance in early human vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.