ArticleBMJ mental health2026
Challenges and solutions to participation in mental health clinical trials: Count Me In 2.0.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health clinical trials in the UK face significant recruitment barriers, with mental health studies comprising just 3.3% of approved interventional medicinal product trials. Challenges include the limited numbers of trials and clinician gatekeeping-where clinicians decide whether or not to inform patients about research opportunities, limiting patient awareness and recruitment. The 'Count Me In' (CMI) approach, an opt-out recruitment model launched in Oxford in 2021 and then in Liverpool City Region in 2024, aimed to address these issues by directly contacting patients to discuss research opportunities, empower them in the shared decision process and embed participation in research into real-world clinical care. In this paper, we discuss the need for advancing beyond the original CMI model, including the requirement for enhanced data capture, mechanism for patient outreach that prioritises inclusive practices for improving participation and ensuring diverse, representative trial populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.