Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554584›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Impact of vitamin D non-reimbursement policy on therapy discontinuation in the general and rheumatic population in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study.

Amit Singh, Victor J B Huiskes, Bart J F van den Bemt, Hedye van Ameijden, Michael T Nurmohamed, Karin M Spijkers, Marcia Vervloet, Anne E M Brabers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Amit SinghDepartment of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands a.singh@maartenskliniek.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0835-1459
Victor J B HuiskesDepartment of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bart J F van den BemtDepartment of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hedye van AmeijdenReade, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michael T NurmohamedReade, Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karin M SpijkersDepartment of Pharmacy, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcia VervloetNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anne E M BrabersNivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of the non-reimbursement policy on vitamin D therapy discontinuation in patients from the general and rheumatic populations.

designA cross-sectional study.

settingResearch institute specialised in health research and two outpatient pharmacies in the Netherlands.

participantsPatients from the general and rheumatic population with an active prescription for vitamin D supplementation therapy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected between April and May 2023 through self-reported questionnaires. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using STATA V. 17. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who discontinued vitamin D supplementation therapy following the implementation of the non-reimbursement policy. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported reasons for therapy discontinuation and the association between patient-related characteristics and the risk of therapy discontinuation. In addition, the proportion of patients who switched to an alternative supplement and whether this switch had been made in consultation with a healthcare provider was examined.

resultsOf the 4800 patients, 302 (6.4%) patients discontinued their vitamin D therapy. The three most frequently reported reasons for therapy discontinuation were the inability to afford supplements without reimbursement, not willing to pay for supplements without reimbursement and being unaware of the alternative vitamin D supplements to switch to. Younger age, financial constraints and limited health literacy were significantly associated with vitamin D therapy discontinuation (p<0.05). Among the 1478 patients that switched to an alternative supplement, 706 (17.9%) patients indicated that they made the switch in consultation with a healthcare provider.

conclusionThe implementation of the non-reimbursement policy resulted in a small proportion of patients discontinuing their vitamin D therapy. Elevated discontinuation rates were associated with specific patient-related characteristics including patients aged <50 years, those experiencing financial constraints and those with limited health literacy, suggesting the need for developing interventions and preventive strategies to support patients at risk of therapy discontinuation.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsDrug MonitoringRheumatic DiseasesVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSurveys and QuestionnairesVitamin DCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Care CostsPatientsPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID41554584
PMCPMC12820843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.