Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554563›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research2026

Clinical Outcomes of Tegoprazan Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Retrospective, Observational Study.

Jin Lee, Jongha Park, Jino Park, Yong Eun Park, Joon Hyuk Choi, Nae-Yun Heo, Seung Ha Park, Tae Oh Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jin LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jongha ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Jino ParkDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Yong Eun ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Joon Hyuk ChoiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Nae-Yun HeoDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Seung Ha ParkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Tae Oh KimDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Tegoprazan is an alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study evaluated the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) and cardiovascular (CV) complications in patients with ischemic heart disease undergoing antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were treated with tegoprazan or PPIs. Methods: Data from 604 patients who received antiplatelet therapy with tegoprazan or PPIs for >6 months after PCI between March 2019 and November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary GI endpoints were symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers and upper GI bleeding, while the primary CV endpoints comprised major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), target vessel revascularization, and death from CV-related causes. Results: Among the 604 patients, 265 received tegoprazan and 339 received PPIs. During a mean follow-up of 17 months, seven patients experienced a GI event (0.4% with tegoprazan vs. 1.8% with PPIs; p=0.112) and 12 experienced MACEs (1.1% with tegoprazan vs. 2.7% with PPIs; p=0.183). Subgroup analysis indicated that target vessel revascularization occurred in six patients, with event rates of 0.8% (n=2) for tegoprazan and 1.2% (n=4) for PPIs (p=0.598). Tegoprazan was associated with similar rates of nonfatal MI (0.8% vs. 2.4%; p=0.125) and death from CV-related causes (0.4% vs. 0%; p=0.258) as PPIs. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in GI- or CV-related complications between patients treated with tegoprazan and those treated with PPIs.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesPeptic ulcerPlatelet aggregation inhibitorsProton pump inhibitorsTegoprazan

Identifiers

PMID41554563
PMCPMC12997061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.