Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554166›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026

Comparison of Unhoused and Domiciled Patients Evaluated for Trauma in a Level II Trauma Center.

Paul A Silka, Miriam R Elman, Margarida Bettencourt, Melissa Harte

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul A SilkaProvidence Seaside Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Seaside, Oregon.
Miriam R ElmanOregon Health & Science University-Portland State University, School of Public Health, Biostatistics & Design Program, Portland, Oregon.
Margarida BettencourtUnaffiliated.
Melissa HarteRegional Medical Center of San Jose, San Jose, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCalifornia has one of the highest rates of homelessness in the United States. Unhoused individuals often have complex medical and behavioral health disorders, frequently complicated by substance use disorders. They have a significant risk of sustaining traumatic injuries. This report compares unhoused and domiciled patients treated at our Northern California trauma center.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis of trauma patients we used data extracted from our institution's Trauma Quality Improvement Program Trauma Registry for January 1, 2019-April 22, 2022 and compared characteristics of unhoused and domiciled individuals. All unhoused patients in the registry were included in the analysis, as well as an equal number of domiciled patients who were randomly selected during the same time frame. We described and compared demographic and clinical characteristics.

resultsOf 8,529 patients in the registry, 181 (2.1%) were unhoused, and we selected 181 domiciled patients to compare. Unhoused patients were more likely male (83% vs. 61%, P < .001) and younger (48.8 ± 12.3 vs. 55. 8 ± 23.7 years, P <.001). Both cohorts had similar Injury Severity Scores. However, unhoused patients had a higher rate of hospital admissions (76.8% vs. 61.9%, P <.001) and longer hospital stays than domiciled patients (4.0 [IQR 2.0-9.0] days vs. 3.0 [IQR 1.0-6.0] days, respectively; P = .02). A higher proportion of unhoused patients received alcohol-(85.6% vs. 74.6%, P = .01) and drug screening (56.4% vs. 30.4%, P < .001) than domiciled patients. Of those screened for urine drugs, unhoused patients had a higher positive rate (76.5% vs. 50.9%, P < .001). Unhoused patients were more frequently injured by assault (30.4% vs. 8.8%, P < .001) or pedestrian strike (21.5% vs. 3.3%, P < .001), whereas more domiciled patients were injured in falls (46.4% vs. 21.5%, P < .001) and motor vehicle accidents (29.8% vs. 8.3%, P < .001). Falls were most common in the oldest quartile for both groups. In both cohorts, a "sharp object" was the most common mechanism of assault injury (40.0% vs. 37.5%, respectively). Assault by firearm occurred in 14.5% of unhoused and 18.8% of domiciled patients. Overall mortality was 2.2%, with no significant difference between groups (1.7 vs. 2.8%, P = .70).

conclusionUnhoused patients were predominantly younger males with a higher incidence of substance use disorder and greater likelihood of injuries from assault and pedestrian strikes. Falls and assault with a sharp object were common in both cohorts. Unhoused patients were admitted more often and stayed longer in the hospital. Understanding the complexities of these patients can guide local and regional prevention and treatment measures.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsTrauma CentersWounds and InjuriesAdultAgedCaliforniaFemaleHospitalizationHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID41554166
PMCPMC12815505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.