ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Comparison of Acute Stroke Outcomes Between Code Trauma vs Code Stroke Activations.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with acute stroke may occasionally present as trauma activations, particularly after being found down or sustaining falls. This atypical presentation can delay diagnosis and treatment. Our objective in this study was to compare time to brain imaging, use of reperfusion therapies, and clinical outcomes, including discharge disposition and mortality, between patients with acute stroke presenting as code trauma activations and those presenting as code stroke activations.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of all trauma activations at our Level I trauma center from January 2018-December 2024. Patients diagnosed with acute stroke on initial trauma imaging after trauma evaluation formed the code trauma activation (CTA) group. These patients were compared to all patients diagnosed with acute stroke after a code stroke activation (CSA) in 2024. The primary outcome was door-to-imaging time; secondary outcomes included door-to-intervention time, discharge disposition, and mortality.
resultsThere were 208 CSA patients and 198 CTA patients. The CTA patients were older (75.3 vs 70.3 years of age, P < .001) and had a higher percentage of hemorrhagic stroke (43.9% vs 14.4%, P < .001). The CTA patients had a higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (14.44 vs 9.67, P < .001). Despite minimal injuries (mean Injury Severity Score 3.3), CTA patients experienced longer times to initial brain imaging (47.4 vs 24.8 minutes, P < .001). Mean door-to-thrombolysis (50.3 vs 43.7 minutes, P = .19) and door-to-puncture time (98 vs 82 minutes, P =.18) did not differ significantly. The CTA patients had lower rates of discharge home (23.2% vs 42.8%, P < .001) and higher mortality (24.2% vs 12%, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, trauma activation itself was not independently associated with mortality (OR 1.57, CI, 0.53-4.27, P =.42). Age, stroke severity scores, hemorrhagic stroke, and early imaging were independently associated with mortality after acute stroke.
conclusionAcute stroke patients presenting as trauma activations face significant delays in imaging and lower rates of thrombolytic treatment, despite low injury burden. While trauma activation designation was not independently associated with mortality, delays in imaging and higher hemorrhage prevalence were strongly linked to worse outcomes. These findings highlight modifiable workflow opportunities, particularly streamlined imaging and early stroke recognition in low-impact trauma presentations, to improve delivery of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.