ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
An Organized Approach to Using Large Language Models for Medical Information.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChatGPT and other large language models (LLM) have increased in popularity. Despite the rapid rise in the implementation of such technologies, frameworks for implementing appropriate prompting techniques in medical applications are limited. In this paper we establish the nomenclature of "variable" and "clause" in the prompting of a LLM, while providing example interviews that outline the utility of such an approach in medical applications.
methodsIn this study assessing the LLM ChatGPT-4, we define terms used in prompting procedures including "input prompt," "variable," "demographic variable and clause," "independent variable and clause," "dependent variable and clause," "generative clause," and "output." This methodology was implemented with three sample patient cases from both a patient and physician perspective.
resultsAs demonstrated in our three cases, precise combinations of variables and clauses that consider the patient's age, gender, weight, height, and education level can yield unique outputs. The software can do so quickly and in a personalized, patient-specific manner. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can be used to generate comprehensive sets of educational material to augment current limitations, with the potential of improving healthcare outcomes as the use of LLM is further explored.
conclusionThe framework we describe represents a unique attempt to standardize a methodology for medical inputs into a large language model. Doing so expands the potential for outlining patient-specific information that can be implemented in a query by either a patient or a physician. Most notably, future projects should consider the specialty- and presentation-specific input changes that may yield the best outputs for the desired goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.