ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026
Preliminary Post-Dobbs Trends in Emergency Department Use for Early Pregnancy Complications.
Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFollowing the 2022 Dobbs Supreme Court decision, emergency department (ED) use for early pregnancy complications (EPC), such as miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy, may increase in states that enacted severely restrictive abortion policies. Patients may increasingly seek EPC-related care in the ED due to delays in treatment resulting in greater symptom severity or reduced access to usual settings of obstetric and family planning care. Our objective in this study was to examine the association between severely restrictive abortion policies and post-Dobbs EPC-related ED visits.
methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study used data from the 2016-2022 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Our primary outcome measure was ED visits among female patients 15-49 years of age for EPC-related care, defined using encounter diagnosis code or chief complaint. We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between US region and post-Dobbs, EPC-related visits, as the number of states with severely restrictive abortion policies (bans from conception to six weeks) varied by region, from zero (Northeast) to 10 of 17 states in the South.
resultsWe identified 7,872,445 weighted EPC-related visits (unweighted n = 1,008) among 266,222,232 weighted (unweighted n = 32,841) encounters for female patients 15-49 years of age (3.0%). The median age was 28 (IQR 23-32). The proportion of pre- vs post-Dobbs EPC-related visits was 3.1% vs 2.5% in the Northeast (P = .72); 3.2% vs 3.5% in the West (P = .80); 2.4% vs 3.1% in the Midwest (P = .36); and 2.9% vs 3.7% in the South (P = .50). Compared to the Northeast, the adjusted odds of post-Dobbs EPC-related visits were 1.4 in the West (95% CI, 0.4-5.2), 1.4 in the Midwest (95% CI, 0.4-4.6), and 1.3 in the South (95% CI, 0.4-4.7).
conclusionThis preliminary study did not find a statistically significant association between US region and post-Dobbs ED visits for early pregnancy complications. However, given the increasing restrictions surrounding reproductive healthcare access, the ED represents an important setting for the delivery of this care. Further investigations using more robust data sources are needed to understand the effect of prohibitive abortion laws on the ED use and the management of early obstetric complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.