Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41554148›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2026

Emergency Physician and Emergency Nurse Communication in the Emergency Department: A Mixed-methods Study.

David C Jones, Jeffrey Phillips, Amanda Graveson, Lindsey Hrizuk, Nichole Meuwissen, Evan Alldredge, Matthew Loxton, Esther Choo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David C JonesOregon Health & Science University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon.
Jeffrey PhillipsOregon Health & Science University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon.
Amanda GravesonCleveland Clinic, Department of Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio.
Lindsey HrizukUniversity of Kansas Health System, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas.
Nichole MeuwissenUniversity Health, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Evan AlldredgeLegacy Emmanuel Hospital, Anesthesia Critical Care, Portland, Oregon.
Matthew LoxtonBlue Faery: The Adrienne Wilson Liver Cancer Association, Birmingham, Alabama.
Esther ChooOregon Health & Science University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe emergency department (ED) is a setting where communication occurs often and with potential consequences for patient care. In this study we sought to determine nurse and physician perspectives on the nature and implications of effective and ineffective communication in the ED.

methodsWe used a mixed-methods design, including an online survey followed by in-person focus groups with emergency nurses (EN) and emergency physicians (EP). Participants were recruited through email listserves to emergency staff at four hospitals. We integrated quantitative survey results with focus-group themes.

resultsA total of 115 eligible ENs and EPs completed the initial questionnaire (50% response rate from ENs, 65% response rate from EPs). Responses from nurses and physicians were similar; both noted that poor communication is frequent, adversely affects patient care and ED function, affects trust, particularly between individuals, and that non-verbal communication behaviors affect team communication. In the focus groups (consisting of 18 EPs and 17 ENs), six themes emerged: 1) Situations, built physical environment, and medium of communications all impact quality of communication; 2) core elements of desired professional communication include respect and attention, often conveyed through non-verbal behaviors; 3) poor communication begets poor communication and influences interpersonal relationships; 4) effective communication is seen as fundamental to patient care but also has impacts beyond patient care; 5) clinician gender and gender dyads influence communication dynamics; and 6) participants were able to identify learning activities and techniques for effective communication.

conclusionEmergency nurses and physicians across four EDs described failures of communication as both frequent and significant to patient care. This study identified characteristics of effective communication, complex factors influencing communication, and emphasized the whole-team impact of communication quality.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency NursingEmergency Service, HospitalPhysician-Nurse RelationsPhysiciansAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41554148
PMCPMC12815571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.