Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2025
Evaluation of Dizziness in the Emergency Department: Prevalence and Diagnostic Utility of Clinical Scales for Functional Vertigo.
Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFunctional vertigo is commonly missed in the emergency department (ED) and often misdiagnosed as other peripheral vestibular disorders. It is strongly associated with anxiety and depression, yet standardized diagnostic criteria are lacking in the ED setting, leading to unnecessary tests and misdiagnosis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Vertigo Symptom Scale - Short Form - Autonomic (VSS-SF-A) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A) and - Depression (HADS-D) for distinguishing functional vertigo from other peripheral vertigos in the ED and to determine its prevalence.
methodsThis was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational studey of adult patients of a tertiary-care ED with dizziness.. We included patients who received an initial peripheral vertigo diagnosis from attending emergency physicians. Blinded otolaryngologists (ENT) verified all final diagnoses through standardized evaluation methods performed on the same day as the ED visit. We excluded patients with central, metabolic, cardiovascular conditions. Study participants received thorough vestibular evaluations while a separate physician, also blinded to diagnostic outcomes, administered the VSS and HADS tests, which typically require 15-20 minutes to complete. The final ENT evaluation served as the criterion reference for the diagnosis of functional vertigo. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the scales through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
resultsDuring the study period, 694 patients presented to the ED with dizziness-related complaints, of whom 69 (9.9%) met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. Of 69 patients initially diagnosed with peripheral vertigo in the ED, ENT specialists confirmed functional vertigo in 25 (36.2%) and peripheral vertigo in 44 (63.8%). Functional vertigo patients were significantly younger (43.4 ± 16.9 vs 60.1 ± 14.9 years of age, P < .001). In patients with functional vertigo, the mean VSS-SF-A, HADS-A, and HADS-D scores were 9.04, 9.28, and 7.52, respectively, compared to 3.80, 4.18, and 2.91 in peripheral vertigo cases. Conversely, the VSS-SF subscale-Vestibular-Balance (VSS-SF-V)-scores were higher in peripheral vertigo patients (13.05 vs 6.56), all P < .001. The ROC analysis showed that VSS-SF-A (cutoff ≥ 8, area under the curve [AUC] 0.85, 95% CI, 0.76-0.94) had the highest accuracy for diagnosing functional vertigo, with a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 84.1%, followed by the HADS-A (cutoff ≥ 8, AUC = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.70-0.91), which had a sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 88.6%, while HADS-D (cutoff ≥ 4, AUC = 0.80 95% CI, 0.60-0.90) showed 76% sensitivity and 75% specificity.
conclusionFunctional vertigo is an underdiagnosed condition that produces dizziness in patients. The Vertigo Symptom Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale show promise for enhancing early diagnosis while reducing unnecessary imaging and improving patient care. Future research is needed to confirm these findings through larger multicenter cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.