Trial reportEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Atrioventricular synchrony maintained by a dual-chamber leadless pacemaker in real-world conditions.
Trial report in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05252702 (Aveir Dual-Chamber Leadless i2i IDE Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Aveir Dual-Chamber Leadless i2i IDE Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsA dual-chamber leadless pacemaker (LP) system relies on a beat-to-beat, wireless, implant-to-implant (i2i™) communication between implanted devices in the right atrium and right ventricle (A-to-V and V-to-A). Atrioventricular (AV) synchrony was evaluated during an ambulatory 24 h period of daily living to determine if its effectiveness can be maintained under real-world conditions. METHODS AND
resultsA prospective, single-arm, multicentre clinical study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05252702) evaluated the overall safety and performance of the dual-chamber LPs in patients with standard indications for dual-chamber pacing. Following the 3-month visit, eligible patients wore 12-lead Holter monitors for 24 h while resuming the activities of daily living while under clinically driven programmed settings. Leadless pacemaker diagnostic data were interrogated when patients returned to the clinic. An independent Holter core laboratory adjudicated the proportion of synchronous beats (PR intervals within paced and sensed AV delay bounds). Relationships between AV synchrony and i2i communication success rate, implant indication, heart rate, and AV event type were evaluated. Among 47 analysable patients, mean AV synchrony was achieved in 96.7% of beats, exceeding mean A-to-V and V-to-A transmission success rates of 93.4% and 92.1%, respectively. There were no significant differences in AV synchrony between sinus node and AV block patients. Across all AV paced/sensed cycle combinations and heart rate ranges (including >100 b.p.m.), AV synchrony was sustained >90% in an ambulatory real-world setting.
conclusionA dual-chamber leadless pacing system demonstrated >96% overall AV synchrony for a 24 h period of daily living while programmed to clinically appropriate settings, thus showing that true dual-chamber DDD(R) pacing can be maintained in a real-world environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.