ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
Learning to explore tree neighbourhoods for phylogenetic inference.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylogenetic inference is a key challenge in computational biology, with applications ranging from evolutionary analysis to comparative genomics. The balanced minimum evolution problem (BMEP) offers a well-established formulation of this problem, but remains computationally intractable for large instances. In this work, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) framework to tackle the BMEP through local search in the space of phylogenetic trees. Our contributions are three-fold: (i) we introduce an improved RL formulation tailored to the structure of phylogenetic inference in the context of the BMEP; (ii) we train an RL agent capable of solving instances with up to 100 taxa; and (iii) we investigate the generalization capabilities of the learned policy across different substitution models, instance sizes, and datasets. To address the limitations of relying solely on the learned policy at inference time, we integrate it into a novel search-based framework that enables effective adaptation during evaluation. Experimental results show that our method outperforms greedy heuristics and matches the performance of state-of-the-art algorithms for the BMEP. When tested under significant distributional shifts, we greatly reduce the gap with state-of-the-art algorithms. This demonstrates the potential of RL applications to phylogenetic inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.