Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553942›Full record

ArticleFetal diagnosis and therapy2026

The Evolution of Cephalocentesis in Contemporary Obstetric Practice: From Emergency Intervention to Planned Procedure.

Catherine Windrim, Yada Kunpalin, Alyaa AlRefai, Erica Holloway, Edmond N Kelly, Peter McParland, Fionnuala M McAuliffe, David Chitayat, Nimrah Abbasi, Shiri Shinar and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fetal diagnosis and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Catherine WindrimFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yada KunpalinFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alyaa AlRefaiFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Erica HollowayFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Edmond N KellyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter McParlandFetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Fionnuala M McAuliffeFetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
David ChitayatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nimrah AbbasiFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shiri ShinarFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rory WindrimFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gareth SeawardFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Johannes KeunenFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tim Van MieghemFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Greg RyanFetal Medicine Unit, Ontario Fetal Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, greg.ryan@sinaihealth.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Introduction: The aim of the study was to analyze the evolution, indications, and outcomes of cephalocentesis over a 38-year period at two tertiary fetal medicine centers.

methodsA retrospective review of 70 cephalocentesis procedures (1985-2023) was conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, and the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin. Cases were divided into pre-2002 (n = 37) and 2002-onward (n = 33) cohorts in order to evaluate practice evolution.

resultsMean gestational age at diagnosis was 32.7 ± 5.4 weeks with severe hydrocephalus in 95.7% (67/70) and hydranencephaly in 4.3% (3/70) of cases. Pre-2002, 94.6% (35/37) of procedures were performed intrapartum; 2002 onward, this shifted to 66.7% (22/33) pre-labor planned procedures with 84.8% (28/33) using a transabdominal approach. Concurrent fetal analgesia and potassium chloride (KCl) to achieve fetal asystole was introduced in 2002. Vaginal delivery was achieved in 95.7% (67/70) of cases. Perinatal mortality (excluding KCl cases) was 91.8% (45/49). All four survivors (5.8%) demonstrated neurodevelopmental impairment.

conclusionCephalocentesis has evolved from an intrapartum intervention to a planned procedure with standardized protocols. Our findings support reserving this procedure for cases where there is no expectation of postnatal survival, with the primary purpose of facilitating vaginal delivery when caesarean section could unnecessarily increase maternal morbidity. </p>.

Indexed as

HydranencephalyHydrocephalusAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyRetrospective StudiesCephalocentesisFetal hydrocephalusPregnancy terminationSevere ventriculomegaly

Identifiers

PMID41553942
PMCPMC12948379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.