ReviewCerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Standardized Anatomical Classification of Intracranial Hemorrhage.
Review in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntracranial hemorrhage (ICrH) is an umbrella term that encompasses any hemorrhage within the skull. The underlying mechanisms, clinical presentations, and management strategies for ICrH vary considerably based on the anatomical location of the blood. However, the current terminology for ICrH is often ambiguous and inadequate for conveying the precise anatomical origins and extent of the hemorrhage, contributing to confusion and inconsistency in both clinical practice and research. To address these challenges, we identify six key shortcomings in current usage and propose a harmonized terminology for anatomical classification. SUMMARY: We propose the following clarifications: (i) intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) refers to any hemorrhage within the parenchyma of the brain or the brainstem; (ii) isolated intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) denotes hemorrhage confined to the ventricles, whereas extended IVH represents IPH extension into the ventricles; (iii) intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) includes IPH and/or IVH; (iv) ICrH encompasses all hemorrhage within the skull (i.e., intraparenchymal, intraventricular, subarachnoid, subdural and epidural hemorrhages); (v) precise anatomical terminology should be favored over the ambiguous term "hemorrhagic stroke"; and (vi) the term "hemorrhage" indicates an active hemorrhage process, whereas "hematoma" describes the resulting mass or collection of blood. KEY MESSAGES: We invite stroke physicians and researchers to use this harmonized terminology to standardize and facilitate communication, as well as the interpretation and translation of research findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.