Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553846›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Interprofessional Collaboration Between Community Health Workers and Pharmacists.

Carole Bandiera, Megan Darwood, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Elizabeth Harris, Mark F Harris, Parisa Aslani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Community Health Workers' and Pharmacists' Perspectives of a CHW-Pharmacist Collaboration Model to Support Medication Adherence.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Interprofessional Collaboration Between Community Health Workers and Pharmacists.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carole BandieraFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9996-3100
Megan DarwoodThe University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sabuj Kanti MistrySchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Elizabeth HarrisInternational Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Mark F HarrisInternational Centre for Future Health Systems, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0705-8913
Parisa AslaniFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7976-8236

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation P500PM_217609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity health workers (CHWs) can bridge the gap between health and social services and the communities they serve. CHWs can work collaboratively with healthcare professionals, such as pharmacists, in addressing peoples' social determinants of health. However, little is known about how CHWs and pharmacists collaborate. We aimed to explore the interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and CHWs in Australia and New Zealand and identify the challenges and strategies in their collaborative practice.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with pharmacists and CHWs in Australia and New Zealand, to explore (i) CHW-pharmacist interprofessional collaboration experiences, (ii) how pharmacists perceived CHWs' roles and vice-versa, (iii), challenges to collaborative practices and (iv) strategies to foster their collaboration. Interviews took around half-an-hour and were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and inductively thematically analysed.

resultsTwenty-nine participants (16 pharmacists and 13 CHWs) were interviewed, 19 worked in Australia and 10 in New Zealand. Participants reported that CHWs connected the patient and the pharmacist and helped bridge cultural gaps, shared patient-related information with the pharmacist, supported patient medication management and adherence, and referred patients to pharmacists. CHWs helped patients to take up pharmacy services and reinforced pharmacists' recommendations. There was a lack of clarity regarding each other's role, but pharmacists and CHWs acknowledged the benefit of each other's roles. Key challenges to collaborative practices were poor communication between CHWs and pharmacists, and lack of guidelines on the collaborative practices. Strategies to promote collaboration included clarification of their roles, improving the working relationship and knowledge of the mutual benefits of collaboration.

conclusionsThe study identified some collaborative practices between CHWs and pharmacists. However, challenges remain, including a lack of clarity regarding CHWs' roles by pharmacists. Future research should focus on improving knowledge of the mutual benefits of collaboration, and codesigning a CHW-pharmacist collaborative intervention with guidelines to standardise and foster collaboration. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients, service users, care-givers, people with lived experience or members of the public were not involved in the study design or conduct of study, analysis or interpretation of the data or in preparation of the manuscript.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersCooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsPharmacistsAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandProfessional RoleQualitative Researchcollaborative practicecommunity health workershealth navigatorsinterprofessional collaborationinterprofessional collaboration challengesinterprofessional collaboration strategiespharmacists

Identifiers

PMID41553846
PMCPMC12815246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.