Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553762›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2026

Evaluating Mobile Information Apps for Parents of Preterm Infants After Hospital Discharge: Systematic App Review.

Martine Jeukens-Visser, Monique Flierman, Eline Möller, Renate Giezeman, Raoul Engelbert, Daniël Bossen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Martine Jeukens-VisserDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-4509
Monique FliermanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1579-7011
Eline MöllerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3494-1058
Renate GiezemanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3610-786X
Raoul EngelbertDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6923-8696
Daniël BossenFaculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-4245

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter hospital discharge, parents of preterm infants need accessible and reliable information to gain confidence and skills in their child-caring abilities and parental autonomy. Parental need for information after hospital discharge includes topics related to prematurity, such as crying, feeding, sleeping, infant care, general health, and neuromotor development. However, parents report difficulty in finding and understanding this information. Mobile apps have the potential to improve information provision.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic app review was to (1) identify mobile apps for parents of preterm infants targeting the period after hospital discharge and (2) evaluate the content, quality of the app, and understandability and actionability of the information material.

methodsWe systematically searched for apps in the Apple App Store, Google Play Store, and Google, along with a literature search using PubMed. Multiple keywords were used (eg, "preterm baby," "app," and "home"). Apps were included when they provided information for parents on topics and content related to prematurity after hospital discharge. To examine app content related to the postdischarge period, apps were reviewed, and topics were identified. The Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) was used to measure the app's quality, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-AV) was used to measure the understandability and actionability of the information material.

resultsAfter the initial search, the titles and descriptions of 196 apps were screened for eligibility. Eventually, 9 English apps were included in the review. Information related to the postdischarge period constituted only a small part of the app's content. Most commonly addressed topics related to the period at home were vaccinations, follow-up, feeding, and using home oxygen. Using the MARS, only one of the 9 apps received a good score for overall quality ("MyPreemie app"; Graham's Foundation), and 7 apps received an acceptable score. Only 4 apps scored high on understandability of the PEMAT-AV, and 6 apps scored high on actionability. No Dutch apps were identified.

conclusionsThe current availability of mobile information apps for parents of preterm infants targeting the period after hospital discharge is limited. A total of 9 English apps were identified, which contained a small portion related to the postdischarge period. This content is not comprehensive for the postdischarge period: topics indicated as relevant by parents, such as crying in preterm infants, diaper change in preterm, or parental well-being after preterm birth, are often missing. The overall quality of the apps is only acceptable. Although the reliability of the information was close to good, the understandability of the apps was moderate. Recommendations for future app development include more relevant and understandable information related to the postdischarge period, which meets the demand of parents of preterm infants.

Indexed as

appeducationhealth informationinfancyinfantinformation qualitymHealthmobile healthmobile information applicationsneonatalneonatenewbornprematurepretermreview

Identifiers

PMID41553762
PMCPMC12865341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.