Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553724›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied behavior analysis2026

Turning the page: Increasing young children's preference for looking at and engaging with books.

Katharine Loomis, Lilian Morales, Yoojin Yeo, Daniel M Fienup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied behavior analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katharine LoomisDepartment of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1857-9033
Lilian MoralesDepartment of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-384X
Yoojin YeoDepartment of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3593-5757
Daniel M FienupDepartment of Health Studies and Applied Educational Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0593-2929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although many studies have focused on teaching components of reading (blending, fluency), fewer studies have evaluated how children become interested in looking at and engaging with books. In this study, we evaluated the effects of a continuous reinforcement procedure on children's preference for engaging with books using a concurrent multiple-probe-across-participants design. The procedure involved providing rich social interactions and reinforcers when children engaged with books. Across two experiments and six preschool participants with disabilities, we observed children who rarely engaged with books before the intervention shift their preference to book engagement following the intervention. These outcomes were observed both in the intervention and naturalistic play settings, including during maintenance probes. Additionally, in Experiment 2, children's performance task behavior increased when books were presented as a consequence during a performance task. The outcomes are discussed in terms of promoting preference for book stimuli in the context of typical and instructional contexts.

Indexed as

BooksChoice BehaviorReadingReinforcement, PsychologyChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalebook engagementcontinuous reinforcementpreferencepreschoolersreading

Identifiers

PMID41553724
PMCPMC13500362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.