ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Transanal excision of rectal lesions using a single port robot: outcomes of initial 81 resections.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Transanal robotic versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for complex distal colorectal lesions: a comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Fiftieth Anniversary of the Publication of the World Journal of Surgery Title: Landmark Advances in Colorectal Surgery: A Primer of a Fifty-Year Evolution.World journal of surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transanal excision of rectal lesions remains challenging due to limitations in visualization and access to the cephalad margin, often resulting in high rates of piecemeal excision and positive margins. Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), developed using laparoscopic instruments, aimed to improve transanal exposure and reach. We present our experience with single-port robotic TAMIS (SP rTAMIS) to assess its safety and efficacy. A prospectively maintained database of SP robotic colorectal resections performed between October 2018 to September 2024 was retrospectively reviewed to identify all SP rTAMIS operations performed. Cases were analyzed regarding peri-operative outcomes to determine the efficiency and safety of this operation. A total of 81 SP rTAMIS operations were performed. Men comprised 59% of the patients. Tumor characteristics were (mean/range): size 3.56 cm (1–8), inferior level 4.96 cm (0–30), cephalad margin 8.8 cm (2–35). Preoperative diagnoses included: cancer 41, adenoma 34, other 6. Average EBL was 33 cc (0–250) with a median of 10 cc. There were no transfusions. Conversion to an alternative approach occurred in 3.7% of cases. Piecemeal excision rate was 1.23%. There were no positive margins. Overall morbidity was 7.4%. There were no mortalities. Mean follow-up time was 15.3 months (0–32.3 months). Local recurrence was 1.23%. SP rTAMIS was found to be an excellent option for transanal resection of rectal lesions in this initial series. It enabled safe en-bloc resection and primary closure with low positive margin rates and subsequently low local recurrence rates. SP rTAMIS offers the promise to extend the application of endoluminal transanal surgery, although further studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553640What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.