ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Do likes reflect quality? Engagement metrics and information reliability of robotic surgery short videos.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the rapid rise of short-video platforms as health information sources, the informational quality of robotic-surgery videos-an area requiring precise clinical explanation-remains insufficiently studied.
objectiveTo compare the quality and reliability of robotic-surgery videos on TikTok and Bilibili and determine how platform features and uploader identity shape content quality.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 200 videos (100 per platform) scored using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN). Videos were coded by uploader type and theme, and group differences and predictors were examined with nonparametric tests and multivariable regression.
resultsTikTok videos drew more engagement, but Bilibili posts were longer and scored higher on GQS and mDISCERN. Professional uploaders produced the most reliable content. Engagement metrics correlated with each other yet did not predict quality in regression.
conclusionsOn short-video platforms, visibility and scientific accuracy diverge-highlighting the need for professional involvement, quality-sensitive governance, and stronger public digital health literacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.