ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2026
Systemic Therapy for Salivary Gland Cancers: A Review of Targeted and Chemotherapeutic Approaches.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolving Concepts in Salivary Duct Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Oncology and therapy · 2026Review
- Prognostic Impact of MYC/TP63 Molecular Subtypes in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementSystemic therapy for recurrent and metastatic salivary gland malignancies (SGMs) remains a major therapeutic challenge. Traditional chemotherapy offers modest response rates with limited durability, and its role is largely palliative. The most meaningful advances have occurred in biomarker-selected subgroups: androgen receptor blockade for AR-positive salivary duct carcinoma and HER2-directed therapy for HER2-positive tumors have demonstrated superior response rates and survival (often exceeding 50%), compared with the single digit response rates seen with unselected chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as lenvatinib and axitinib may provide disease stabilization in adenoid cystic carcinoma, although tumor shrinkage is uncommon and toxicity limits their long-term use. Immunotherapy as a single agent has been disappointing, but durable responses in select patients and modest activity with combination regimens suggest it may have a future role when rationally paired with other agents. In our practice, comprehensive molecular profiling is essential at the time of recurrence to identify actionable alterations, prioritize targeted therapy where available, and guide clinical trial enrollment. For most patients without a targetable alteration, platinum-based combinations remain the pragmatic choice, though expectations for benefit should be tempered. Future strategies will likely hinge on optimizing biomarker-driven therapies, expanding access to antibody-drug conjugates, and pursuing collaborative trial designs to overcome the rarity and heterogeneity of these tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.