Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553606›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Socioeconomic Status, Religiosity and Loneliness in the United States: Resource Substitution or Resource Multiplication?

Laura Upenieks, Riley Peterson, Terrence D Hill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura UpenieksDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, 97326 One Bear Place, Waco, TX, 76798, USA. laura_upenieks@baylor.edu.
Riley PetersonDepartment of Sociology, Baylor University, 97326 One Bear Place, Waco, TX, 76798, USA.
Terrence D HillDepartment of Sociology and Demography, University of Texas at San Antonio, One UTSA Circle, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study employs national survey data collected roughly one year into the COVID-19 pandemic to examine the direct effects of SES (education and income) and religiosity on loneliness. Drawing on theories of resource substitution and resource multiplication, we test whether religiosity moderates the effects of SES on loneliness. Findings suggest that respondents with higher levels of education and income tend to report lower levels of loneliness. However, in accordance with resource substitution, the protective effect of income on loneliness was attenuated by higher divine control beliefs, while the protective effect of education was less pronounced among respondents reporting fewer R/S struggles. In support of resource multiplication, the protective effect of education on loneliness was amplified by regular religious attendance. We extend prior studies of religiosity and loneliness and suggest directions for future work.

Indexed as

EducationIncomeLonelinessReligionReligious strugglesSocioeconomic status

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.