ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Machine learning-based risk modeling for safety-focused learning curve assessment in robotic left-sided colorectal cancer surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Learning curves in Versius-assisted colorectal surgery: a risk-adjusted CUSUM analysis from a single center.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- The diet-microbiota-inflammation axis and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition from laparoscopic to robotic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer raises safety concerns during the learning curve, particularly when complex cases are preferentially selected for the robotic platform. We evaluated a machine learning-based framework for risk-adjusted safety monitoring of robotic implementation, using outcomes from an established laparoscopic program as the reference. We retrospectively analyzed adult patients who underwent minimally invasive left-sided colorectal resection for malignancy between May 2023 and September 2025. A penalized logistic regression model predicting a composite adverse endpoint (anastomotic leak, reoperation, major complication, unplanned intensive care admission, or mortality) was developed in a laparoscopic training cohort (n = 211) using four preoperative variables (age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and tumor location). Model-derived expected risks were applied to a robotic cohort (n = 93) to construct a risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) chart. The robotic cohort included a higher proportion of rectal tumors and more frequent neoadjuvant therapy than the laparoscopic cohort and had longer operative times, whereas the composite adverse event rate was similar (12.9% vs. 13.3%). The RA-CUSUM curve for the robotic series fluctuated around the expected risk baseline derived from the laparoscopic benchmark without a sustained upward drift. These findings suggest that, in this single-center experience, early robotic adoption did not show a clear signal of excess risk-adjusted short-term adverse events despite increased case complexity and demonstrate the feasibility of embedding a laparoscopic-derived risk model into RA-CUSUM analysis as a pragmatic tool for learning curve assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553590What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.