ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
A review of current therapeutics for psoriasis: Systemic and topical use of non-biological drugs.
Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A systems-oriented Ayurvedic approach in chronic plaque psoriasis with renal inflammatory indicators: a 2-year longitudinal case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePsoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by dysregulated cytokine signaling, keratinocyte hyperproliferation, and recurrent relapses requiring sustained management. Although biologic agents have transformed treatment by selectively targeting IL-17, IL-23, and TNF-α pathways, important limitations persist, including high costs, limited accessibility, treatment failures, and insufficient long-term safety data. Therefore, topical therapies and non-biologic small-molecule systemic agents remain essential, particularly for mild-to-moderate disease and for patients ineligible for biologic therapy. This review provides an integrative assessment of established and emerging topical and non-biologic systemic treatments.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed® and ClinicalTrials.gov with 'psoriasis, topical therapies, clinical trials, systemic therapy' keywords, identified several small-molecule classes in active clinical development, including JAK/TYK2 inhibitors, PDE-4 inhibitors, AhR modulators, A3AR agonists, RORγt and ROCK2 inhibitors, S1P1 modulators, and IRAK4/RIPK1 inhibitors.
resultsAmong these, oral TYK2 inhibitors have shown the most consistent late-phase success, offering superior PASI responses, rapid onset of action, and favorable emerging long-term safety profiles. Early-phase studies of other targets report promising reductions in inflammatory biomarkers and lesion severity, though interpretation remains limited by small cohorts, short follow-up, and the lack of head-to-head comparisons. Topical therapies, especially corticosteroids, remain foundational first-line options and valuable adjuncts to systemic regimens. While topical JAK inhibitors have generated interest in clinical trials, their clinical efficacy has not paralleled the superior outcomes achieved with oral JAK/TYK2 inhibitors.
conclusionOverall, current evidence suggests that targeted non-biologic small molecules are gaining importance as scalable, patient-friendly alternatives to biologics. Their optimal placement within future treatment algorithms will depend on long-term safety data, comparative clinical trials, biomarker-guided patient selection, and cost-effectiveness analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.